Sir Ernest Rutherford, president of the Royal Society and Nobel Prize for Chemistry in 1908, had who once received a call from a colleague. He was about to suspend a student for the answer to a problem of physics, despite the boy's claim that he was absolutely correct. My friend asked me to impartial arbitration.
referenceThe question read: "Show how you can set the height of a building using a barometer." The student had answered: "Take the barometer to the roof of the building and tied a long rope. Then I pick up the steel frame and measure. The length of the rope is the height of the building. "
The answer posed a serious problem because, although it is undoubtedly correct, if granted the student with the highest score, you certify a high level in physics, which was not confirmed. I asked that he be given another chance, this time with the caveat that should demonstrate their knowledge of physics.
Five minutes later he had not written anything. I encouraged him to start and he said he had many answers that his difficulty was to choose what was best. I begged to be decided at a time. In the next minute he wrote: "I take the barometer, I throw it to the ground from the roof and calculate the decay time with a stopwatch. Then apply the formula Height = 0.5 A / t ^ 2. and so also get high. " Read
the measurement alternatives or write your own reviews.
0 comments:
Post a Comment